In Haskell, we have a lot of typeclasses. Those are very handy and – in general – come with laws. Laws are very important and give hints on how we are supposed to use a typeclass.
For instance, the Semigroup typeclass
exposes an operator ((<>)) and has an
associativity law. If a,
b and c have the same type
T, if we know that T is a
Semigroup, we have the following law:
If T is a Monoid, which is a
Semigroup with an identity (called
mempty), we have a law for monoids:
Those laws can – have – to be used in our code base to take advantage over the structures, optimize or avoid boilerplate.
In some situations, we want a way to express default values. That’s especially true in OO languages, like in the following C++ function signature:
In Haskell, we cannot do that, because we have to pass all arguments to a function. The following doesn’t exist:
And there’s more. Even in C++, how do you handle the case when you have several arguments and want only the first one to be defaulted? You cannot.
So, so… Some Haskellers decided to solve that problem with a typeclass. After all, we can define the following typeclass:
We can then implement Default and have a
default value for a given type.
instance Default Radians where
def = Radians $ 2*pi
instance Default Fullscreen where
def = Fullscreen FalseHowever, there is an issue with that. You cannot use
Default without creating newtypes to
overload them. Why? Well, consider the following
Default instance:
Remember that, in Haskell, an instance is defined only once and is automatically imported when you import the module holding it. That means you cannot have the following:
-- in a module A
instance Default Float where
def = 0
-- in a module B
instance Default Float where
def = 1
-- in a module C
import A
import B
-- What instances should we use?Hey, that’s easy. We just have to keep the modules apart, and import the one we want to use!
Yeah, well. No. No.

Orphan instances are wrong. You should read this for further explanations.
That’s why we have to use newtypes everywhere. And
that’s boring. Writing code should always have a goal. When we
write as much boilerplate code as real code, we can start thinking
there’s something wrong. Worse, if we have more boilerplate than
real code, well, something is terribly wrong. In our case, we’re
introducing a lot of newtypes for only being able to
use def at a few spots. Is that even worth it? Of
course not.
The Default typeclass is evil. It’s shipped with
default instances, like one for [a], which defaults
to the empty list – []. It might be clear for you but
why would I want to default to the empty list? Why not to
[0]? Or a more complex list? I really doubt someone
ever uses def :: [a].
Another reason why Default is wrong? There’s
absolutely no law. You just have a default value,
and that’s all.
Can you say what the default is for? Of course you cannot. Because there’s no law. The instance has no real meaning. A default value makes sense only for the computation using it. For instance, the empty list makes sense if we glue it to the list concatenation.
In base, there’re already several ways to express defaulted values.
The Monoid’s mempty is a way to
express a default value regarding its binary operation
((<>)).
The Alternative’s empty provides a
similar default, but for first-class types.
The MonadZero’s mzero provides a
different default, used to absorb everything. That’s a
law of MonadZero:
Those defaults are interesting because we can reason about. If
I see mzero in a monadic code, I know that
whatever is following will be discarded.
So please. Stop using Default. It doesn’t bring
any sense to your codebase. It actually removes some! If you want
to provide functions with defaulted arguments, consider partially
applied functions.

data-default is a very famous package – look at the downloads! You can now have some hindsight about it before downloading it and ruining your design. ;)
Happy hacking. :)